Why Brand Management Will Replace Marketing

Why Brand Management Will Replace Marketing | eklectic.in

P&G’s decision to formally end the era of “marketing” at the company and make the shift to brand management may accelerate what amounts to much more than a title change for marketers generally. It could point to a fundamental re-examination of the role of the people responsible for brands.

While “marketing” and “brand management” are often treated as synonyms, there is an important distinction between the two terms. Marketing focuses on the activities associated with the promotion and distribution of products and services. Brand management has, for many, been historically focused on identity management but is now much more concerned with the active management of the market value and competitive strength of a brand as an (intangible) company asset.

Marketing is about spending money. It’s how brands accumulate value. Brand management should focus on how products continue to wrap story and distinction around what they offer to increase competitiveness and build loyalty. The two are linked – but different. Marketing is the means. Brand management should be the goal.

Source: Branding Strategy Insider | Why Brand Management Will Replace Marketing


Rights to all content (text, images, videos etc.) with post source. If you think these are wrongly attributed email us




Related posts

Marketing: What are brands for?

Marketing: What are brands for?


Marketing: What are brands for?

When Imperial Tobacco, the world’s fourth-largest cigarette-maker, said in July that it would spend $7.1 billion to expand its business in America, its chief executive, Alison Cooper, was adamant on one point: it will not be buying companies. Instead, in a three-way deal with Reynolds American and Lorillard, it will pick up a factory, a sales force and, above all, a collection of brands. Two of them, Winston and Blu (an electronic-cigarette brand), will be “the focus for the lion’s share of time and money invested”. No management expert would think it strange that Imperial would spend the best part of $7 billion on something as ethereal as brands. They are the most valuable thing that companies as diverse as Apple and McDonald’s own, often worth much more than property and machinery. Source: Marketing: What are brands for? | The Economist Rights to all content (text, images, videos etc.) with post source. If you think these are wrongly attributed email us

How Lego rebuilt its brand brick by brick

How Lego rebuilt its brand brick by brick


How Lego rebuilt its brand brick by brick

Lego, taking its name from ‘leg godt’, Danish for ‘play well’, began life in the early 1930s. In the 1950s the company, with founder Ole Kirk Kristiansen’s son Godtfred at the helm, introduced its system of play concept, with the interlocking plastic bricks we know today arriving in 1958. Through the introduction of its core principles of play, the company’s mission was, and still is, to inspire and develop the builders of tomorrow, enabling children to learn through play – thus ‘playing well’. But Lego’s journey hasn’t been smooth, with decades of success preceding a brush with bankruptcy, followed by its meteoric rise in recent years to become the most powerful brand in the world, according to a February study published by Brand Finance. Source: Well played – How Lego rebuilt its brand brick by brick | The Drum Rights to all content (text, images, videos etc.) with post source. If you think these are wrongly attributed email us


The Power Formula for LinkedIn Success - Buy Now


The Power Formula for LinkedIn Success - Buy Now

The Power Formula for LinkedIn Success : Kick-start Your Business, Brand, and Job Search Paperbackby Wayne Breitbarth Many LinkedIn books focus solely on creating a killer LinkedIn profile. But LinkedIn is not a passive sport. You can't just sit around waiting for people to find your awesome profile. This book will help you create a top-notch profile AND make REAL MONEY with LinkedIn. Rights to all content (text, images, videos etc.) with post source. If you think these are wrongly attributed email us

Leave a comment